Drawing for BETTER JOBS FOR A BETTER LIFE

USPTO serial 76008400

BETTER JOBS FOR A BETTER LIFE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HAYASH, SUSAN C
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BETTER JOBS FOR A BETTER LIFE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carla Oakley

CARLA OAKLEY BROBECK PHLEGER & HARRISON LLPSPEAR ST TWRONE MARKETSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for maintaining a database for use in posting employment opportunities and in managing the related hiring process for use on a global computer networkACTIVE—
035Career placement and employee recruiting services; providing information at job fairs regarding employment and career opportunities; online information services, namely, providing a web site containing information in the field of employment opportunities, career placement, and the hiring processACTIVE—
038Providing interactive website featuring electronic bulletin boards for the exchange of information in the field of employment opportunities and managing the hiring processACTIVE—
041Education services, namely, providing seminars, training courses and arranging and conducting educational conferences in the field of employee recruiting, resumes, job interviews and job searches, and career planningACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 25, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 4, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 4, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 29, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 27, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 4, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 11, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 29, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 18, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 10, 2001CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 8, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 22, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 8, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance