USPTO serial 76008426
DUEL MONSTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DUEL MONSTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minato-Ku, Tokyo, JP
Minato-Ku, Tokyo, JP
TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN R. COLEMAN
JEFFREY H KAUFMAN OBLON SPIVAK MCCLELLAND MAIER NEUSTADT1940 DUKE STARLINGTON, VA 22314UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | PLAYING CARDS AND INSTRUCTION MANUALS SOLD THEREWITH; COMPUTER GAME INSTRUCTIONAL MANUALS, PRINTED GAME INSTRUCTION SHEETS, PRINTED SCORING SHEETS, STRATEGY GUIDE BOOKS AND STATIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KONAMI CO, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by KONAMI CO, LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by KONAMI CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named DUEL MONSTERS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 11, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 17, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 14, 2003 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 24, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 19, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |