USPTO serial 76008541
MODUM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MODUM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark S. Svat
MARK S SVAT FAY, SHARPE, FAGAN, MINNICH & MCKEE, LLP1100 SUPERIOR AVE SEVENTH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ON-LINE INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC RETAILING AND AUCTIONING SERVICES VIA A WEB SITE PERTAINING TO THE HIDE AND LEATHER INDUSTRY; A DATABANK INCLUDING MARKET INTELLIGENCE CENSUS AND EVALUATION OF TANNERIES AROUND THE WORLD, LISTS OF TECHNICIANS, LOGISTICS, SCHEDULES, PRICES ON AUCTION AND EXCHANGES IN CONNECTION WITH HIDES, LEATHER, CHEMICALS AND MACHINES; INFORMATION ABOUT CUSTOMER'S REQUIREMENTS, BASED ON PURCHASING PATTERNS CAPACITY AND TRANSACTIONAL RECORDS; INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENTS, INCLUDING MACHINERY, PROCESSES, INNOVATIONS AND TRADE REGULATIONS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |