USPTO serial 76008616
MYLCI.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCMORROW, JANICE LEE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MYLCI.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey H. Brown
JEFFREY H BROWN D' ANCONA & PFLAUM LLC111 E WACKER DRSTE 2800CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Online stores featuring educational, developmental, entertainment, and recreational toys and games for children and infants; online stores featuring interactive multimedia computer game programs, pre-recorded CD-ROMS, and pre-recorded video and audio tapes, which feature music and narration for the education, development, and/or recreation of children; online wholesale distributorships and stores featuring products dealing with pets and animals for stimulating the imagination of children, namely, fabricated pets and accessories therefore, live animals, books, brochures, magazines, newspapers, all featuring children's topics and all for the development, and/or recreation of children; online wholesale distributorships and stores featuring children's toys and products, namely board games, hand-held electronic games, electronic table top games, puzzles, pull toys, activity kits comprised of components for imaginative play and interactive story books using play systems; online wholesale distributorships and stores featuring dolls, felt boards, child and infant developmental toys, namely, model train sets, play sets for interactive and reactive play, model vehicles and related accessories, and infant toys, namely, rattles and stacking rings and related accessories; online stores featuring toys in the form of kits of mating parts inclusive of manual and electronically controlled motor units for driving any of a plurality of models constructed therefrom, learning aids, books and magazines featuring children's topics | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing on-line chat rooms and bulletin boards for the transmission of messages among computer users concerning toys, games, educational, developmental, entertainment and recreational products and activities for children and infants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely providing consumer and retailer product information on-line in the field of toys, games, educational, developmental, entertainment and recreational products and activities for children and infants | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 30, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |