USPTO serial 76008738
GIVING VOICE TO THE NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, WENDY BETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GIVING VOICE TO THE NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CELIA G. SPIRITOS
CELIA G SPIRITOS BOX INTELLECTUAL PROPERTYHOGAN & HARTSON LLP8300 GREENSBORO DR STE 1100MCLEAN, VA 22102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications equipment and software; namely, satellite communications systems comprising access, control and management software, satellite modems, channel units, forward error-correcting coder-decoders (CODECS), and complete earth stations containing RF radio and antenna; personal communications systems and microcellular systems comprising digital telephone handsets, base stations, and call processing software; voice and data modems; packet switches and circuit switches; multiplexers; software and related hardware for transmitting voice, facsimile, data, image, and video over local area networks and wide area networks; voice compression software and component parts therefore, and voice compression systems comprising multi-rate coder-decoders (CODECS) and echo cancelers based on digital signal processing; facsimile networks comprising stand alone facsimile machines and computer hardware and software for transmitting facsimile data by way of a distributed network, hardware capable of running a stored program by way of non-fax modems; network management systems comprising configuration data bases and alarm and control software; computer software for use in the transmission of voice, facsimile, data, image and video network communications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |