USPTO serial 76009298
VORTALIZER.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VORTALIZER.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin G. Smith
KEVIN G SMITH SUGHRUE MION ZINN MACPEAK & SEAS PLLC2100 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20037-3213UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROVIDING ONLINE AUCTIONS OF A VARIABLE STOCK OF ITEMS BY MEANS OF AN INTERACTIVE E-COMMERCE AND INTERACTIVE WEB SITE; PROVIDING A WEB SITE ON GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS NETWORKS FEATURING INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF AUCTIONS AND OTHER FAIR MARKET PRICING METHODS; LICENSING OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE IN THE FIELD OF PRICING METHODS FOR AUCTIONS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING AND MAINTAINING A SPECIALIZED WEB SITE FOR OTHERS FEATURING WEB SITE LINKS TO MULTIPLE BUSINESS ENTITIES WITH E-COMMERCE AND INTERACTIVE FUNCTIONALITY IN THE FIELDS OF AUCTIONS AND FAIR MARKET PRICING OF GOODS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 9, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |