USPTO serial 76009355
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Melanie Luten
MELANIE LUTEN ROBINS KAPLAN MILLER & CIRESI LLP2600 ONE ATLANTA PLZ 950 E PACES FERRY RDATLANTA GA, IA 30326-1119| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising and business services, namely the provision of marketing and advertising services via a global computer network | ABANDONED | Jan 10, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 16, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 8, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |