USPTO serial 76009472
CYBER-DUMMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOONEYHAM, JANICE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CYBER-DUMMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ADRIANA E KIERSZENBAUM
ADRIANA E KIERSZENBAUM LAW OFFICE OF JON A DORF LLPMAMARONECK TOWN CTR740 W BOSTON POST RD STE 302MAMARONECK, NY 10543-3345Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing ergonomic and non-ergonomic computer, Internet and personal technology interfacing and branding services, namely audio production and recording, community level educational services, computer education (eg, courges) and training services (eg, correspondence and vocational schools), computer disks (eg, DVD and CD ROM), diskettes, mail services and manuals, conducting classes, conferences, seminars and workshops, development and disscmination of educational materials, educational research, educational testing, organizing exhibitions, presenting awards, competitions, and recognition and incentive programs, television production, television programming, and vocational education | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |