USPTO serial 76009949
HORNBECK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SATCHI, SUDARSHINI
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HORNBECK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert C. Shaddox
ROBERT C SHADDOX WINSTEAD SECHREST & MINIDK PCHOUSTON, TX 77002-5895UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | MARITIME TRANSPORT BROKERAGE SERVICES | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1997 |
| 039 | PROVIDES MARINE TRANSPORTATION AND SUPPORT SERVICES, NAMELY TUG BOAT SERVICES, HARBOR AND COASTAL TOWING SERVICES, CHEMICAL AND FUEL TRANSPORTATION BY BOAT, OFF-SHORE TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FOR THE OIL-DRILLING INDUSTRY, NAMELY, PROVIDING SUPPLY VESSELS, GEOPHYSICAL VESSELS, VESSELS USED IN MAINTENANCE AND CONSTRUCTION BARGES, CREWBOATS UTILITY BOATS,DEEPWATER PLATFORM SUPPLY VESSELS AND RIG SUPPLY VESSELS | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 14, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 15, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |