USPTO serial 76010198
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert A. Kouts
ROBERT A KOUTS SCHEINTHAL & KOUTS, LLP4635 SW FWY STE 720HOUSTON, TX 77027UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Granular absorbent oil-based composition for absorbing spills from floors | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2000 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2002 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 29, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 11, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 4, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 18, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |