USPTO serial 76010211
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
20122, Milano, IT
SO.GE.M.I. SOCIETA GESTIONE MARCHI INTERNAZIONALI S.R.L.
MOGLIANO VENETO (TREVISO), IT
Other trademarks owned by SO.GE.M.I. SOCIETA GESTIONE MARCHI INTERNAZIONALI S.R.L.
SO.GE.M.I. SOCIETA GESTIONE MARCHI INTERNAZIONALI S.R.L.
MOGLIANO VENETO (TREVISO), IT
Other trademarks owned by SO.GE.M.I. SOCIETA GESTIONE MARCHI INTERNAZIONALI S.R.L.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James V. Costigan
James V. Costigan HEDMAN & COSTIGAN, P.C.1230 Avenue of the Americas, 7th FloorNew York, NY 10020UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Ladies, gents, and children's clothing, namely, suits made of leather, shirts, blouses, skirts, jackets, trousers, shorts, vests, jerseys, pajamas, stocking, singlets, corsets, garter, belts, pants, bras, petticoats, hats, neckties, rain coats, over coats, great coats, bathing suits, sports overalls, wind resistant jackets, ski pants, belts, fur coats, fur jackets, fur hats, fur stoles, fur capes, scarves, gloves, dressing-gowns, and shoewear, namely, slippers, shoes, sportshoes, boots and sandals | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 26, 2002 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |