USPTO serial 76010402
BIDET FRENCH MILLED SOAP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2720318Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 3, 2003
- Examiner
- COWARD, JEFFERY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIDET FRENCH MILLED SOAP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
National City, CA
National City, CA
National City, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | BAR SOAP | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 19, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Sep 25, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Sep 22, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PRA8 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 | — |
| Sep 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 21, 2008 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| May 27, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 20, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |