USPTO serial 76010517
OZ-ERCISE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYASH, SUSAN C
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OZ-ERCISE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Boots
DANIEL L BOOTS BINGHAM SUMMERS WELSH & SPILMAN2700 MARKET TWR10 W MARKET STINDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2982Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Toys, namely action skill games; mechanical and electric action toys; action type target games; stuffed toy animals; baby and children's multiple activity toys; toy bakeware and cookware; balloons bath toys; toy building and construction blocks; board games; card games and equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; doll cases; cases for play accessories; Christmas tree decorations and ornaments; doll clothing; children's play cosmetics; costume masks; crib mobiles and crib toys; doll house furnishings; dolls and accessories therefor; paper face masks; card games; infant action crib toys, jigsaw puzzles; jump ropes; kick board floatation devices for recreational use; kites; floating recreational lounge chairs; magic tricks; marbles; costume masks; face masks; swim masks; toy mobiles; model vehicles and related accessories sold as a unit; electronically operated toy motor vehicles; musical toys; plush toys; toy record players; ride-on toys; role playing games; stuffed toy animals; toy action figures and accessories therefor; yo-yo's; punching bags; swim floats for recreational use; costume and play jewelry for children; sporting goods, namely exercise platforms; exercise weights and weightlifting gloves; water wing swim aids for recreational use, inflatable swimming pools, and play swimming pools | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 30, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |