USPTO serial 76011061
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JoAnne S. Redmann
Joshua J Burker Seyfarth Shaw LLP1075 Peachtree St., NESte 2500Atlanta, GA 30309-3958| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Medical and health-care cost review and management, cost/price analysis, account auditing, negotiation of medical bills and insurance claims, providing consumer-oriented medical bill review and other health-related consumer services, medical referrals and attorney referrals, pre-arranged pricing for medical services, scheduling of medical services, comparative pricing of medical services, physician and medical service provider reviews, via a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Bill payment services, bill consolidation services, electronic processing and transmission of bill payment data, insurance claims processing, medical and insurance consultation and electronic processing of medical and insurance claims and payment data, via a global communications network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Information via a global communications network maintaining files and records containing the medical condition of individuals | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |