USPTO serial 76011169
BEYOND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEYOND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Victoria 3011, AU
Victoria 3011, AU
TULLAMARINE, AU
TULLAMARINE, AU
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS APPARATUS, NAMELY, MOBILE TELEPHONES AND ACCESSORIES FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES, NAMELY, PORTABLE HEADSETS, BATTERIES FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES, IN-CAR BATTERY CHARGES, TRAVEL CHARGERS, TWIN CHARGES, COVERS, TRANSPARENT CASES FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES, ANTENNAS, HOLDER BELT CLIES, HANDS-FREE CAR DEVICES FOR USING MOBILE TELEPHONES, AND MAGNETIC MOBILE TELEPHONE HOLDERS; LEATHER CASES FOR MOBILE TELEPHONES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by LAI, JOHN
- Other trademarks owned by YEUNG, KEN
- Other trademarks owned by BEYOND HOLDINGS PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by BEYOND HOLDINGS PTY. LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named BEYOND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | CRAF | AMENDMENT CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 14, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 26, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |