USPTO serial 76011237
Serial No. 76011237
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3161230Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 24, 2006
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 76011237?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Yamanouchi Pharma Technologies, Inc.
Palo Alto, CA
Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharma Technologies, Inc.
ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NORMAN, OK
Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NORMAN, OK
Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Chuo-ku, Tokyo, JP
Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
ASTELLAS PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
ASTELLAS PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
CHUO-KU, TOKYO, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Barbara L. Friedman, Susan G. O'Neill, Garner K. Weng, Alexandra V. Atencio
Barbara L. Friedman Hanson Bridgett Marcus Vlahos & Rudy, LLP425 Market Street, 26th FloorSan Francisco, CA 94105UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Manufacture of rapidly dissolving pharmaceutical products for others | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Research and development of rapidly dissolving pharmaceutical products and technologies related thereto for others, and consultation about testing, evaluating or researching pharmaceutical products | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharma Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Yamanouchi Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ASTELLAS PHARMACEUTICAL CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 31, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 4, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 4, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2006 | NEWR | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; NEW BASIS APPROVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 17, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 28, 2005 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 13, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 15, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2004 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 12, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 28, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |