USPTO serial 76011322
U-DRIVE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BORSUK, ESTHER
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with U-DRIVE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Williamsport, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick N. Samuels
FREDERICK N SAMUELS CAHN & SAMUELSHEADQUARTERS BLDG2000 P ST NW STE 200WASHINGTON, DC 20036Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | circuits for driving large capacitive loads | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2005 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 12, 2005 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2005 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 14, 2004 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 9, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |