USPTO serial 76011455
C
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with C?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELA M FIFELSKI
ANGELA M FIFELSKI ICE MILLER1 AMERICAN SQ # 82001INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46282-0020UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | heat-treating machines for use with advanced computer controlled induction heating technology; motor gears for machines; transmission gears for machines; engine transmission pumps for land vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | land vehicle parts, namely, motorcycle, train and automotive transmissions and engines; engine parts for marine vehicles; engine parts for air craft | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | services of induction heat treating parts for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design for others in the field of engineering precision components used in engines, transmissions, motors and pumps, design induction heat-treat machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 12, 2002 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |