USPTO serial 76011521
LAZYTOWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAZYTOWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
101 Reykjavik, IS
101 Reykjavik, IS
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Sofer
JOSEPH SOFER SOFER & HAROUN LLP215 Lexington Ave1301NEW YORK, NY 10016Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely, t-shirts, sweatshirts, baseball caps, and jackets | ACTIVE | Sep 29, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 9, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 30, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 4, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 12, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 10, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |