USPTO serial 76011593
LONG BEACH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 20, 2002
- Examiner
- STINE, DAVID
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LONG BEACH INTERNATIONAL FILM FESTIVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine Endo Chuck
CATHERINE ENDO CHUCK MCBIRNEY & CHUCK800 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 340LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | entertainment services, namely, planning, managing, and conducting an international film festival, sponsoring of competitions and awards in recognition of excellence in film, and education services, namely, presentation of symposiums and tributes related to film | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 11, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 20, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 8, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |