USPTO serial 76011730
COACHING FOR EXCELLENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 24, 2002
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with COACHING FOR EXCELLENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Organizational Dynamics Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
Organizational Dynamics Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
Organizational Dynamics Associates
Laguna Niguel, CA
Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas J. Borchard, Esq.
Thomas J. Borchard, Esq. BORCHARD & CALLAHAN, APC25909 PALASuite 300MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational services, namely, conducting training seminars and workshops for instructors and teachers in the field of the art of coaching | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
- Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
- Other trademarks owned by Organizational Dynamics Associates
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named COACHING FOR EXCELLENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 20, 2008 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| May 13, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 11, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 18, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |