USPTO serial 76011862
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Chapman
DANIEL CHAPMAN JACKSON WALKER, LLP112 E PECAN, STE 2100SAN ANTONIO, TX 78205UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | power tools, namely, hand-held drills, table drills, drill presses, circular saws, table saws, jigsaws, miter saws, reciprocating saws, electric screw drivers, belt sanders, orbit sanders, power grinders, power planers, power routers, cut-off machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | automotive parts, namely, brakes for land vehicles and replacement parts therefore, namely, brake pads, brake pad wear spacers, brake pad silencers, brake calipers, brake rotors, brake shutoff valves, high pressure brake lines, brake line pressure gauges, brake hats, brake hubs, brake brackets and brake fittings, and brake drums; remanufactured automotive components, namely, calipers, water pumps, smog pumps, blower motors, master cylinders, power brake boosters, wiper motors, power steering components, electrical components, automotive cordless air compressors, automotive winches, automotive jump starters and components therefore; and components for automotive chassis and engines, namely, belts, air filters, oil filters, and spark plugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | computerized on-line retail and wholesale services featuring auto parts and power tools | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 29, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 9, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |