USPTO serial 76012055
EMERCHANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EMERCHANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LARAINE M WARD
LARAINE M WARD INFOSPACE, INC601 108TH AVE NE STE 1200BELLEVUE, WA 98004-4374UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY THE DISSEMINATION OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS VIA A GLOBAL INFORMATION NETWORK; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION REGARDING DOING BUSINESS VIA ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | PROVIDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS, NAMELY ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION OF DATA, IMAGES AND DOCUMENTS FOR COMPUTER NETWORKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, IMPLEMENTING, AND MAINTAINING WEB SITES AND ON-LINE STORE FRONTS FOR OTHERS; PROVIDING BUSINESS INFORMATION REGARDING DOING BUSINESS VIA ELECTRONIC COMMERCE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |