USPTO serial 76012234
DAYTON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAITO, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAYTON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia V5L1V4, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian Geoghegan
BRIAN GEOGHEGAN PERKINS COIE LLP1201 THIRD AVESTE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Bags, namely, backpacks, day packs, hiking packs, namely, backpacks used to carry hiking equipment, hydration packs, namely, backpacks comprised of a water storage container, a delivery tube, and a mouthpiece, athletic bags, gym bags, purses, suitcases, fanny packs and waist packs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 20, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |