USPTO serial 76012590
REDLINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REDLINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RITA COYLE DEMEULES
KARI J WANGENSTEEN CORPORATE LEGAL DEPT., B6BEST BUY ENTERPRISE SERVICES INC7601 PENN AVE SRICHFIELD, MN 55423Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable musical sound recordings in the nature of pre-recorded music digitally-streamed and transmitted for consumer downloads | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | publications namely, newsletters, books, brochures, posters, and pamphlets pertaining to entertainment and music | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Music publishing; video tape and television show productions; and entertainment services, namely, production and planning of live events in the nature of musical performances | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by REDLINE ENTERTAINMENT, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Buy Concepts., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Best Buy Concepts., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named REDLINE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 25, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 26, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 23, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |