USPTO serial 76012693
INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND POLYMER SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 9, 2004
- Examiner
- FICKES, JERI J
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND POLYMER SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Middlefield, OH
Middlefield, OH
Middlefield, OH
MIDDLEFIELD, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
D. Peter Hochberg
D PETER HOCHBERG D PETER HOCHBERG CO LPA1940 E 6TH ST - 6TH FLCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2294UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | custom manufacture of rubber products for use in automotive and industrial and marine applications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Duramax, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Duramax, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Duramax, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by JOHNSON RUBBER COMPANY, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named INNOVATIVE DESIGN AND POLYMER SOLUTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 8, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 9, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 14, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 13, 2002 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 13, 2002 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 30, 2001 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 30, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |