Drawing for THE WORLD E-COMMERCE EXCHANGE

USPTO serial 76012766

THE WORLD E-COMMERCE EXCHANGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLD, BARBARA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE WORLD E-COMMERCE EXCHANGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cathy J. Futrowsky

CATHY J FUTROWSKY COUDERT BROTHERS1627 I ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20006-4007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business-to-business e-commerce services, namely, on-line ordering and retail services featuring a wide variety of general merchandise; providing computer e-commerce services which allow users to perform electronic business transactions via the Internet; and providing business information via web sites on the Internet in the nature of business to business e-commerce transactions; dissemination of advertising for others via an on-line electronic communications networkACTIVE—
036On-line financial exchange services, financial clearing houses, and insurance claims administration and processingACTIVE—
042Designing, creating, hosting and maintaining Internet websites for others for the purpose of conducting on-line e-commerce transactionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 9, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 9, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 11, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 7, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 27, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 27, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 15, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 15, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 12, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 23, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 20, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance