USPTO serial 76012772
ELECTRASOL MICROTABS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASE, LEIGH CAROLINE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ELECTRASOL MICROTABS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1118 BH Schiphol Airport, NL
1118 BH Schiphol Airport, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHELDON R. PONTAOE
LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VALLEY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical for use in the manufacture of detergents in the consumer cleaning products industry; descaling agents; water softeners, other than for household purposes; all aforementioned goods with or without a disinfective component; stain protective chemical preparations for glassware, porcelain and earthenware, crockery and other kitchenware | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | laundry bleach, laundry bluing, laundry pre-soak, laundry detergent and dishwashing; additives for laundry and dishwashing preparations for household purposes-- laundry preparations for drycleaners; general purpose household cleaning, polishing, scouring and abrasive preparations; carpet cleaning preparations; laundry and dishwashing detergents; decalcifying and descaling preparations for household purposes; fabric softeners and laundry additives; all aforementioned goods with or without a disinfective component | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt Benckiser N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named ELECTRASOL MICROTABS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 26, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 19, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |