USPTO serial 76012889
EXTRA CHANCE BLACKJACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXTRA CHANCE BLACKJACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jodi-Ann McLane
JODI-ANN MCLANE SALTER & MICHAELSON321 S MAIN STPROVIDENCE, RI 02903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | providing a side bet in the card game commonly known as "Blackjack" or "21" or "Twenty-One" | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 6, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Jan 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2002 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 19, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |