USPTO serial 76012920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda Heban
LINDA HEBAN JONES DAY REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60601-1604UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer e-commerce software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, namely, for facilitating online shopping and purchasing by means of electronic communications networks; communication software used to access and search for product and services information from websites on global computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | electronic commerce services, namely, dissemination of advertising for others via an online electronic communications network, online retail store services and ordering services featuring a wide variety of consumer goods of others; promoting the products and services of electronic and brick-and-mortar merchants by the administration of incentive award activities, and by conducting contests and promotional activities, namely, through the distribution of printed materials | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | electronic commerce services, namely, electronic credit card and debit transactions, funds, transfers and bill payment processing | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic commerce services, namely, electronic transmission and reception of data, documents and information via computer; electronic data interchange network services | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 31, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 25, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 18, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 15, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |