USPTO serial 76013008
ONE CLICK RETURNS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ONE CLICK RETURNS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas R. Felger
THOMAS R FELGER BAKER BOTTS LLP2001 ROSS AVEDALLAS, TX 75201-2980UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTERIZED ON-LINE MERCHANDISE RETURN SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING AN ON-LINE SERVICE FOR RETURNING UNWANTED MERCHANDISE FROM A CUSTOMER TO A RETAILER OR MANUFACTURER; GATHERING, STORING AND PROCESSING THE INFORMATION NECESSARY FOR RETURNING UNWANTED MERCHANDISE; AND PROVIDING CUSTOMERS, SHIPPERS, RETAILERS AND MANUFACTURERS WITH PRODUCT INFORMATION AND SHIPPING INSTRUCTIONS NECESSARY TO COMPLETE MERCHANDISE RETURNS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 24, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 14, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 12, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |