USPTO serial 76013026
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
Jersey City, NJ
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
Mark I. Peroff Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLP599 Lexington AvenueNew York, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATESCopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 20, 2003 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 9, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 4, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 17, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |