USPTO serial 76013057
GREEN DOLPHIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREEN DOLPHIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MONTEREY PARK, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark B. Garred
MARK B GARRED STETINA BRUNDA GARRED & BRUCKER75 ENTERPRISE STE 250ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | PRE RECORDED AUDIO AND VIDEO CASSETTE TAPES AND COMPACT DISCS FEATURING MUSIC, STORIES, FICTIONAL CHARACTERS, INTERACTIVE VIDEO GAME PROGRAMS, PUZZLES, AND EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS IN THE FORM OF GAMES AND STORIES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PAPER GOODS, NAMELY, ACTIVITY BOOKS, STORY BOOKS, POSTERS, STICKERS, GIFT WRAPPING PAPER, AND PAPER NAPKINS | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | CLOTH DOLLS, HAND PUPPETS, MOLDED PLASTIC TOY FIGURINES, JIGSAW PUZZLES, BOARD GAMES, BATTERY-OPERATED ACTION TOYS, SOFT SCULPTURE TOYS, PLUSH TOYS, ANIMATED ELECTRONIC ACTION TOYS, INTERACTIVE ELECTRONIC ACTION TOYS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |