Drawing for ELCO 400

USPTO serial 76013091

ELCO 400

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELCO 400?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB

ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Chemical products for use in copiers, printers and facsimile machines, namely, ink having a base of polymers, pigment or dye and primer oils for printingACTIVE—
007Digital printing pressesACTIVE—
009Photographic quality color copying machines, personal copying machines and office copying machines; photographic negative and positive printers, large format photographic image printers, video printers, computer graphics printers, micrographic archive printers, optical disk reader printers, continuous electronic color printers; facsimile machines; computer mainframe system printers, computer network printers, desktop computer printersACTIVE—
016Duplicating machinesACTIVE—
035Color reprography servicesACTIVE—
040Photofinishing and photographic color printing servicesACTIVE—
042Printing services; electronic color printing servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 18, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 8, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 17, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 19, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 19, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2001CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 7, 2000CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 5, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance