USPTO serial 76013339
ROSEN HOTELS & RESORTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ROSEN HOTELS & RESORTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David L. Sigalow
DAVID L SIGALOW ALLEN, DYER, DOPPELT, MILBRATH & GILCHRI255 S ORANGE AVE STE 1401POST OFFICE BOX 3791ORLANDO, FL 32802Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2003 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 22, 2003 | PCDE | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DENIED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2002 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 25, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |