CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SCOUT

USPTO serial 76013376

SCOUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SCOUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANTHONY L FLETCHER

ANTHONY L FLETCHER FISH & RICHARDSON PCPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Land motor vehicles, namely, all- terrain vehicles and structural parts thereofACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 12, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 12, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 16, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 16, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 24, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 14, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 31, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 8, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 12, 2004OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 5, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 28, 2003OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Jun 24, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 4, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Dec 27, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 30, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 27, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 25, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 12, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 16, 2002REINREINSTATED—
Nov 28, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance