USPTO serial 76013394
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynne E. Graybeal
JENNIFER L SCULLY FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN PLLCSTE 34001111 THIRD AVESEATTLE, WA 98101| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MODEMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE IN THE NATURE OF SWITCHES, CACHE ENGINES, ACCESS SERVERS, BANDWIDTH MANAGERS AND OTHER INTERNETWORKING HARDWARE COMPONENTS FOR PROVIDING BROADBAND SERVICES; COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR PROVIDING FIREWALLS | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | PRODUCTS MADE FROM PAPER, CARD AND CARDBOARD, NAMELY; STATIONERY, INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND BROADBAND SERVICES, INFORMATION PACKETS ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND BROADBAND SERVICES, AND PRESS RELEASES ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND BROADBAND SERVICES; PRINTED MATTER; NAMELY BUSINESS CARDS, AND CUSTOMER SERVICE ASSISTANCE CARDS; PICTURES; BOOKS, NAMELY INSTRUCTION MANUALS AND CUSTOMER SERVICE BOOKLETS ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND BROADBAND SERVICES; PERIODICALS ABOUT TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT AND BROADBAND SERVICES; AND PRINTED PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, MAGAZINES, NEWSLETTER AND NEWSPAPERS IN THE FIELD OF BROADBAND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | REPAIR AND INSTALLATION SERVICES FOR COMPUTER APPARATUS, NAMELY HARDWARE COMPONENTS FOR PROVIDING BROADBAND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSULTING SERVICES REGARDING THE CREATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BROADBAND SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 7, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 25, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |