USPTO serial 76013474
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
D-l 5236 Frankfurt (Oder), DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael B. Lasky
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP, LLC6500 CITY W PKWYMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55344-7701UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Apparatus for recording, transmission and reproduction of information, namely information terminals, monitors and displays, RF and IR transmitters and receivers, IR beacons; data processing equipment, namely computers, portable computers, notebooks, subnotebooks, handheld computers, PDA's | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunication, wireless transmission of information; services in the domain of telecommunication and wide range transmission of data, namely providing access to information and data networks, providing of information and information brokerage; telecommunication equipment management, namely, planning, configuration and maintenance of telecommunication equipment; wire based and wireless telecommunication services, namely, transmission of data, sound and images, with single or multiple participants; transmission of text and image messages by combination of electronic data transmission methods, electronic message sending | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical consultation in the field of telecommunication, integration of telecommunication systems and telecommunication equipment management; design of data processing programs for others; design of software for information management, especially in the context of information brokerage and wide range information transmission for others; consulting services of an engineer, especially in the domain of wireless information transmission | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 22, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |