Drawing for VIRTUALPHENOTYPE

USPTO serial 76013545

VIRTUALPHENOTYPE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VIRTUALPHENOTYPE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raymond C. Stewart

RAYMOND C STEWART BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLPP O BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for processing genotype data in relation to infective viral strains, converting the data so processed so as to predict viral phenotype in patients as a basis of screening candidate and approved pharmaceutical drugs for potential development of resistance thereto; magnetic data carriers and compact disks containing computer software for processing genotype data in relation to infective virus strains, converting the data so processed so as to predict viral phenotype in patients as a basis of screening candidates and approved pharmaceutical drugs for potential development of resistance theretoACTIVE—
016printed matter, namely brochures, booklets and reports containing results obtained directly, indirectly and/or through the use of computer algorithms in the screening and testing of pharmaceutical drugs; brochures, booklets and reports containing biological, clinical or medical results; brochures, booklets and reports in the form of patient reports; brochures, booklets and reports in the form of scientific research reports; brochures, booklets and reports in the form of diagnostic and laboratory reportsACTIVE—
042Medical care; biological research, clinical medical research and medical research; medical rehabilitation services, namely, managing treatment of patient undergoing chemotherapy; and/or medical services, namely, managing treatment of patients undergoing chemotherapy; therapeutic drug screening and therapeutic drug testing programs; diagnostic laboratory research services in the field of chemistry, bacteriology, virology and oncology, all based on processing genotype data in relation to infective viral strains, and converting the data so processed so as to predict the phenotypeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 17, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 9, 2003ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 1, 2002RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED—
May 9, 2002JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 8, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 17, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 20, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance