USPTO serial 76013585
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
R.J. MILLER & ASSOCIATES (1986) LTD.
Kelowna, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by R.J. MILLER & ASSOCIATES (1986) LTD.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
SUSAN M BELIVEAU SUSAN M BELIVEAU#202, 5005 24TH STVERNON, BC V1T 8X7CANADA| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 013 | A clay target shotgun | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 24, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |