USPTO serial 76013586
LAPTOP ON THE GO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEIMER, CAROLINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAPTOP ON THE GO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Susan M. Beliveau
SUSAN M BELIVEAU SUSAN M. BELIVEAU2 3302 30TH AVEVERNON, BC V1T 2C8CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CUSTOM DESIGNED CLIENT RELATIONS MANAGEMENT COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN LAW FIRMS FOR FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT NAMELY, ACCOUNT RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, TRUST MANAGEMENT, WORK-IN-PROGRESS MANAGEMENT, MULTIPLE USER SIMULTANEOUS TIME AND DISBURSEMENT TRACKING AND FOR CLIENT DATA MANAGEMENT, CLIENT DEADLINE MANAGEMENT, HISTORICAL ARCHIVE MANAGEMENT, FILE STORAGE MANAGEMENT, AND GOVERNMENT FUNDED LEGAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND FOR ANNOTATING WITH MEMORANDA CLIENT CASES CORRESPONDING TO CLIENT FILES AND FOR APPOINTMENT SCHEDULING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 3, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 5, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |