USPTO serial 76013841
CLEARLY ADOBE IMAGING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WAHLBERG, STACY B
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CLEARLY ADOBE IMAGING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent E. Bryan III
VINCENT E BRYAN III ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED801 N 34TH STSEATTLE, WA 98103-8882UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer services, namely, providing information on a wide variety of topics over computer networks, wireless networks and global communications networks; providing on-line books, newsletters, magazines, instructional manuals and user guides in the fields of computers, software, publishing and graphic arts; computer software development and design services for others; computer technical support services in the fields of computers, software, electronics, telecommunications, security and authentication via telephone, e-mail, computer networks, wireless networks and global communications networks; consulting services in the field of computer software development and design; creating and maintaining web sites for others; software rental or leasing services; hosting the web sites of others on a computer server for a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 4, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 17, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 19, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 10, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 10, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 18, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 29, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 19, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |