USPTO serial 76014115
OMP INC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, REBECCA A
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OMP INC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
J. Michael Cleary
SANDRA EDELMAN DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP250 PARK AVE 15TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10177UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated skin care preparations, namely, skin creams, lotions and solutions for the body, hands and face, skin clarifiers, sun block and sun screen, skin cleansing creams and lotions, skin lighteners, skin toners, skin moisturizers, skin exfoliants, cleansing gels, creams, lotions and solutions and aloe vera based gel, astringents for cosmetic purposes, skin emollients, eye creams, blending creams, skin masks, corrector creams; and | ACTIVE | May 21, 2000 |
| 005 | Medicated skin care preparations, namely, medicated cream, lotion, astringent, exfoliants, moisturizer, cleansing cream, cleansing lotion, skin lightener, blending cream, correction cream, mask, emollient, toner, clarifiers, eye cream, sun screen and sun block, skin lightener with sun screen; and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of skin disorders | ACTIVE | May 21, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OBAGI MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OBAGI MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Similar marks named OMP INC
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 14, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 23, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 1, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 1, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 5, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |