Drawing for LIVING AS DESIGNED

USPTO serial 76014154

LIVING AS DESIGNED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIVING AS DESIGNED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul Grandinetti

PAUL GRANDINETTI LEVY & GRANDINETTISTE 14011725 K ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20006-1401

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Home furnishings, namely, furniture, lamps, rugs, cloth table linens; bedding products, namely, mattresses and pillows; and small home accessories, namely, picture framesACTIVE—
035Business services, namely, marketing of home furnishings of others for wholesalers, retailers, and consumers through various distribution channels, namely, catalogs, Internet, and showrooms; retail store services and wholesale distributorships in the field of home furnishings for wholesalers, retailers, and consumers through various distribution channels, namely, catalogs, Internet, and showroomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 10, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2005CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 2, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 12, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 12, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 20, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 31, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 3, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 27, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 27, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance