Drawing for DELTAFLEX

USPTO serial 76014155

DELTAFLEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DELTAFLEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vincent L. Ramik

VINCENT L RAMIK DILLER, RAMIK & WIGHT, PC7345 MCWHORTER PL STE 101ANNANDALE, VA 22003UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006METAL INDUSTRIAL DOORS, AND CONDENSATION AND VAPORIZATION PREVENTION METAL SHEETS USE IN THE CONTAINER, TRANSFER, STORAGE, PETROCHEMICAL AND MECHANICAL INDUSTRIESACTIVE—
017FLEXIBLE RUBBER, PLASTIC, SYNTHETIC AND COMPOSITE TANK SEALS FOR STORAGE TANKS; FLEXIBLE STEEL REINFORCED RUBBER AND PLASTIC SYNTHETIC GASKETS, FLEXIBLE 0-RINGS AND OIL SEALS; FLEXIBLE RUBBER AND PLASTIC SHEETING FOR STOPPING AND INSULATING; SLEEVES FOR CONVEYING FLUID AND GASSES; RUBBER BELLOWS, BEARINGS, MEMBRANES, VALVE SEATINGS, VIBRATION ABSORBERS, AND BUFFERS FOR CONVEYING FLUID AND GASSESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 4, 2002ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 26, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 20, 2002CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 23, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 29, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2000UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance