USPTO serial 76014279
HANDSCAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE RECEIVED AT REPOSITORY HOLDING AREA FOR FILING
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HANDSCAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Paul, MN
St. Paul, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward R. Courtney
EDWARD R COURTNEY LAW DEPARTMENT840 SIBLEY MEMORIAL HWYMENDOTA HEIGHTS, MN 55118UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Chemical sensor device that monitors proper handwashing by individuals with specific soaps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 8, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 20, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 29, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PRRR | PETITION RECONSIDERATION REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 13, 2002 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 22, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 27, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2000 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |