USPTO serial 76014288
SMS MEVAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2894048Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 19, 2004
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMS MEVAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Toren
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | PLANTS AND THEIR COMPONENTS FOR SECONDARY METALLURGICAL AND VACUUM- METALLURGICAL PROCESSES CONSISTING OF VACUUM PUMPS, VACUUM LOCKS, VACUUM TREATMENT VESSELS, SUPPORT AND GUIDE FRAMEWORKS, DUST COLLECTORS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 011 | PLANTS AND THEIR COMPONENTS FOR SECONDARY METALLURGICAL AND VACUUM-METALLURGICAL PROCESSES CONSISTING OF FURNACES, LADLES, CONVERTERS AND RESERVOIRS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION, CONSTRUCTION AND ASSEMBLY OF INDUSTRIAL PLANTS FOR TREATMENT OF METALS; CONSULTATION SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION PLANNING FOR THE AREA OF METALLURGICAL TECHNOLOGY | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | EXPLOITATION OF INDUSTRIAL RIGHTS, NAMELY, PATENT LICENSING; ENGINEERING SERVICES AND TECHNICAL CONSULTATION IN THE AREA OF METALLURGICAL TECHNOLOGY; DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF INDUSTRIAL PLANTS FOR SECONDARY METALLURGICAL AND VACUUM-METALLURGICAL PROCESSES CONSISTING OF VACUUM PUMPS, VACUUM LOCKS, VACUUM TREATMENT VESSELS, SUPPORT AND GUIDE FRAMEWORKS, DUST COLLECTORS; AND CONSISTING OF FURNACES, LADLES, CONVERTERS AND RESERVOIRS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEVAC GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEVAC GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SMS MEVAC GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by SMS VACMETALL Gesellschaft fur Vakuum-Metallurgie mbH
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SMS MEVAC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 25, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 30, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |