Drawing for ATTENAID

USPTO serial 76014401

ATTENAID

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BEYER JR, BROOKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ATTENAID?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. Washburn

CAMILLE M MILLER COZEN O'CONNOR, PCINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPT1900 MARKET STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-3508

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of Attention Deficit Disorder and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 29, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 8, 2001ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 4, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 17, 2000CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 10, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 4, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 19, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 6, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance