USPTO serial 76014450
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
6221 SH Maastricht, NL
6221 SH Maastricht, NL
6221 SH Maastricht, NL
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rochelle D. Alpert
ATTN MALIA ABRIL HEWLETT-PACKARD COMPANY3000 HANOVER ST MS 1051PALO ALTO, CA 94304UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Printing press, and parts and attachments therefor; paper cutting, folding, stapling, and folding machines and parts and attachments therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 009 | optical scanners, computer printers and computer peripherals, computer programs and computer software for printers and scanners, all for use in scanning, printing and imaging and parts and attachments therefore | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | scanning, printing and imaging services; consultation in the field of computer programs and computer software for scanning, printing and imaging; consultation in the field of scanning, printing and imaging machines and apparatus and parts and attachments therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 19, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 31, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |