USPTO serial 76014510
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON, PRICE, HOLMAN & STERN, PLLC400 SEVENTH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CD ROMS AND DIGITAL VIDEO DISCS FEATURING NEWS, COMEDY PERFORMANCES, MUSIC, CARTOONS, MOVIES, SOCIAL ISSUES AND HUMANITIES; APPARATUS FOR RECORDING, TRANSMISSION OR REPRODUCING OF SOUND OR IMAGES, NAMELY VIDEO CASSETTE RECORDERS, DIGITAL VIDEO DISC PLAYERS, CD PLAYERS, CD ROM PLAYERS, DVD PLAYERS, PERSONAL COMPUTERS, TELEVISION SETS; COMPACT DISCS SOLD BLANK FOR RECORDING PURPOSES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | BOOKS, PAMPHLETS, MAGAZINES AND PERIODICALS IN THE FIELD OF MUSICALS, MYSTERIES, CHILDREN'S NEWS, THEATRICALS, CINEMA AND CARTOONS; AND PRINTED MATTER, NAMELY, STATIONERY | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | GAMES, NAMELY, BOARD, ACTION SKILL, PAPER GAMES, COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES, VIDEO GAME MACHINES, CARD GAMES, TRAVEL GAMES, MUSICAL GAMES, VIDEO GAME JOY STICKS, JIGSAW PUZZLES, MANIPULATIVE PUZZLES, AND THREE DIMENSIONAL PUZZLES | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | ADVERTISING AGENCIES, NAMELY, PROMOTING THE SERVICES OR RECORD COMPANIES, PUBLISHING COMPANIES, MOVIE COMPANIES, COMMUNICATION COMPANIES, AND THEATRICAL COMPANIES THROUGH THE DISTRIBUTION OF PRINTED AND AUDIO PROMOTION ADVICE; BUSINESS MANAGEMENT CONSULTATION; BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, NAMELY, ADMINISTRATION OF EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS, OPERATION OF A BUSINESS FOR OTHERS AND PRODUCT MERCHANDISING | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |